That is, howare the hosts connected together and to the internet? layer 2 acrossa router). It looks like NMAP is confused by some things in Windows, and one of those things are the IP addresses in the same broadcast domain. arp -s 10.150.0.41 00-00-00-00-00-00 This will create a static ARP entry for your VPN adapter. http://qaisoftware.com/failed-to/failed-to-determine-dst-mac-address.html
Joseph was very close since its the same root issue. There seem tobe a number of people (guaged by googling) having this problem (and I'mone of them) so I'd like to help solving it. (Just for the record, Ihave researched this They all have no trouble running snort.
Once I disabled it and disconnected it through the vsphere client, there has not been any issues running a scan. Like • Show 1 Like1 Actions ospannero Jul 26, 2012 9:17 AMMark CorrectCorrect AnswerYeah... Later'ish Craig -----Original Message----- From: nmap-dev-bounces () insecure org [mailto:nmap-dev-bounces () insecure org] On Behalf Of I wanna say blabla Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 11:06 AM To: nmap-dev () insecure Thanks, and sorry if I missed something. -- Darren _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/ By Date By Thread Current thread: Failed to determine dst
I have created exactly the same sites and tried scanning but i am being met with the following error. On Windows XP go to Start->Control Panel->Network connections->Right click on “Local area connection(or whatever name you may have for)”->Properties->Internet Protocol(TCP/IP)->Properties->Advanced. The error appears usually if you are trying to scan an ip address from the same network with the MAIN IP on your scan machine. http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/2005/q3/170 See the reply in contextNo one else had this questionMark as assumed answeredOutcomesVisibility: Nexpose1549 ViewsLast modified on Jul 24, 2012 7:10 AMThis content has been marked as final.
But I canoffer my services on a sys/network admin level and try out patches orconfig suggestions.I wasn't sure that the nmap dev list was such a good starting point,thus the reason However, as I haven't been able to recreatethis, maybe you could look at this threadhttp://seclists.org/lists/nmap-dev/2005/Oct-Dec/0108.htmland this guidehttp://www.insecure.org/nmap/install/inst-windows.html#inst-win-sourceTo learn how to compile nmap for free on windows. That I had used since building it and had forgotten to disconnect. If you get no error, read on.
Note that creating a static ARP entry can create a whole set of new problems with your network configuration! But I canoffer my services on a sys/network admin level and try out patches orconfig suggestions.I wasn't sure that the nmap dev list was such a good starting point,thus the reason You should grab the latest 3.93 version of nmap. That I had used since building it and had forgotten to disconnect.
This will not work for the raw modes, but it will give you at least quick access to basic scan. 2) You may add another IP Address to your local machine, his comment is here Later'ish Craig > -----Original Message----- > From: [hidden email] > [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of I wanna say blabla > Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 11:06 AM > To: [hidden email] Thewindows xp firewall has also been ruled out. Starting nmap 3.90 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap ) at 2005-09-13 00:51 ora lega le Europa occidentale ************************INTERFACES************************ DEV (SHORT) IP/MASK TYPE UP MAC eth0 (eth0) (null)/0 ethernet up 00:0A:EB:A4:1D:1E ppp0 (ppp0) 184.108.40.206/32 ethernet
In other words, nmap works fine on the home lan.Machine #3 (different os altogether) with nmap-4.01 gives exactly thesame behaviour as machine #2Preliminary comparison of registry settings yielded nothing useful. No need for anypublic IP addresses, and please mask any addresses you are sensitiveabout, just be consistent, e.g. 192.168.1.1 becomes aaa.xxx.1.1 and192.168.1.100 become aaa.xxx.1.100 but 10.1.1.1 becomes bbb.xxx.1.1.I've looked at this So this seems to be a regression with nmap 3.93 itself, which has been introduced somewhere between nmap 3.81 and 3.93. this contact form Simon Krenger HomeAboutProjectsBlog Blog Categories Linux / WindowsMySQLOraclePersonal Online Me Xing LinkedIn GitHub StackOverflow NMAP through VPN 25.
You should grab the latest 3.93 version of nmap. So from where I sit I havethe perfect lab environment for patch testing. krenger.ch - rockin' since 2011
So to get it working, perform the following steps: Open a console and type ipconfig /all Then look out for your VPN Adapter. I don't have the time toroll up my sleeves and get into the source (it would take me a monthjust to get up to speed again on vc++ and tcp/ip programming). It was configured to use dhcp. It was configured to use dhcp.
Can I patch it?! November 2010, by Simon Krenger When I tried to run a scan with NMAP over my VPN connection, I received the following error: PS C:\> nmap -sP 192.168.10.0/24 Starting Nmap 5.21 I have in fact completed a scan successfully now.I figured it had to be something to do with the CCSVM server as I ran a test scan on a different vm The nmap distros onthese machines are all downloaded w32 binaries.Machine #1 works fine with nmap-3.81, nmap-3.93, nmap-4.01 andnmap-4.02Alpha2.Machine #2 (same os and patch set as machine #1) with nmap-4.01 givesthe dreaded
Join Now!AnsweredAssumed AnsweredSite Scan Failures - Nmap: ERRORQuestion asked by borgy95 on Jul 24, 2012Latest reply on Jul 26, 2012 by ospannero Like • Show 0 Likes0 Comment • 3I have Thewindows xp firewall has also been ruled out. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Search for: Proudly powered by WordPress Skip navigation HomeProducts & ServicesAppSpiderMetasploitNexposeInsightIDRData & AnalyticsIncident ResponseSecurity StrategyInformation SecurityOverviewResearchIndustry NewsIndustry EventsInternet Of ThingsLegislation Nmap - Dev Search everywhere only in this topic Advanced Search Failed to determine dst MAC address for target ***.***.***.*** Classic List Threaded ♦ ♦ Locked 3 messages I wanna say