To fix this problem I’ve set the external interface to an external DNS server". and it was no fun... If DNS is working properly there is no need to use them. Checked the following Registry values (two of them were not present): HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Mup\DisableDFS=0 HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\NetCache\Enabled=1 HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\NetCache\Enabled=1. 3. Source
See ME258296 for information on how to change the binding order of the network adapters so that the adapter that is listed at the top of the Connections list has File Network Access: Let Everyone permissions apply to anonymous users = "Enabled". 2. In our case, it helped to upgrade VMWare Tools on our virtualized Domain Controller (Win 2003 SP2). Un-checking the "register this connection with DNS" setting in the external interface did not work (probably because this was a domain controller). you could check here
Add them back if you removed them. A message that describes the reason for this was previously logged by the policy engine. Make sure your internal interface with all proper bindings needed for resolution is the first in the network access order list "Network Connections >Advanced>Advanced Settings>Adapters and Bindings". Please check to insure it is set to Automatic and it's started.
Will check > 9. I will try this again and let you know. Please specify if the DC is multihomed. > Definitely not - clients, Protocols and Services have been unbound > from other adapters, and the adapters are disabled in hardware manager >> Kb840669 This tells me you have created additional Group Policies.
Here's Why Members Love Tek-Tips Forums: Talk To Other Members Notification Of Responses To Questions Favorite Forums One Click Access Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More... Therefore, I checked that I could dir the whole \\domainname\sysvol etc. All of the share/file permissions were correct, allowing this user to get to the share and to traverse/read the files within it. In the Advanced menu make sure that the most important NIC is on top at the Adapters and Bindings tab.
When the DC is working properly this will be shared automatically. Kb885887 Do you need any Assistance ? x 1 Matthias Junge I got the event 1030 and 1058 on a client PC at a remote site, which is connected via a VPN tunnel to our internal network. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator.OPASR-01.000>ipconfig /all Windows IP Configuration Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : OPASR-01 Primary Dns Suffix . . .
This event is also reported in many instances of upgrades from Windows NT or Windows 2000 to Windows 2003 Server. https://www.petri.com/forums/forum/server-operating-systems/windows-server-2000-2003-2003-r2/58456-constant-1030-1058-errors-w2003-solved x 2 John Poff On Windows 2003 I received this error when I disabled TCP/IP NetBios help service. Windows Cannot Access The File Gpt.ini For Gpo At the command prompt, type "dfsutil /PurgeMupCache" (without the quotation marks), and then press ENTER. Windows Cannot Query For The List Of Group Policy Objects Everything appears to work properly. > > My group policy works perfectly on a Win2k Client.
From a newsgroup post: " If your Windows XP computer is a domain member, and the Distributed File System (DFS) client is turned off (disabled), this behavior will occur, because the this contact form Add the Group Policy Object Editor snap-in for the Local Computer. Have any permissions been altered on the DC's C: drive? I have followed the registry changes in KB 314494 and this has not help. What Is Gpt.ini File
Please join our friendly community by clicking the button below - it only takes a few seconds and is totally free. As per Microsoft: "This issue may occur when a procedure to repair the Group Policy objects (GPO) and the GPO references in the Active Directory directory service on a Windows Small Locate and then click the following registry subkey: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\Kerberos\Parameters. have a peek here x 50 Anonymous I was receiving event 1030 and 1097 every five minutes on a Windows 2003 DC after a reboot.
Move it to the top of the list of Group Policies. Userenv 1058 For example, in a Windows NT 4.0-based domain, you can use Administrator and Administratör as separate account names. I solved the problem by allowing NetBIOS traffic through the VPN tunnel.
but I have been experiencing problem with network resources like shared folders and printers. See also M307900 (http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;307900) on updating Windows 2000 Group Policy for Windows XP. In other words, your hosts > file should look like this (if you have just two domain > controllers): > > 126.96.36.199 yourdomainname.com > > 188.8.131.52 yourdomainname.com > > Where 184.108.40.206 Dfsutil /purgemupcache This means that if there is an ISP's DNS address, or you are using your peripheral firewall/router as a DNS address inany of the DCs, servers and clients, the error you
See ME909260 to solve this problem. Concepts to understand: What is the Group Policy? x 1 Rich Stringer I recently had a 2003 DC start throwing these errors after demoting a W2K box from DC and removing it from the network. Check This Out Will check > 8.
Any alterations to the security policies (IpSec, SMB signing >> behavior, etc). > Maybe... >> 7. x 2 Private comment: Subscribers only. x 114 Anonymous Have been getting the Userenv 1058 and 1030 errors on one of two domain controllers each month for the past 4 months. Join & Ask a Question Need Help in Real-Time?
After going through many steps listed here, the web, and elsewhere (i.e. Posting Guidelines Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.Tek-Tips Posting Policies Jobs Jobs from Indeed What: Where: jobs by HomeForumsDesktop SoftwarePC Operating SystemsMicrosoft: Windows XP Pro Forum Event ID B.Right-click the appropriate connection and press Properties. Followed steps in ME887303, which also refers to ME290647.Step 8 in ME887303 - purging the MUP cache - worked here to resolve the errors both times.
The domain controller is multihomed (which means it has more than one unteamed, active NIC, more than one IP address, and/or RRAS is installed on the DC). Google of course. I tried permissions. I tried re-shares. I checked FRS and DFS and many other TLAs along the way. Nothing. From the 2x domain controllers, I could access the